48. Grade Disputes (Revised: 2005)
The decision as to which procedure to utilize for a grievance filed by a student shall be made solely by the university and shall be based on the fact pattern of each particular case. Each grievance shall be directed to a specific procedure and shall be accorded only one opportunity to be adjudicated unless the appeal body remands for further review.
The student's semester grade shall be based upon the grading rule statement in Section 10.1 and included in the course information distributed at the first class meeting. The rule shall include the calculation of grades, including weights as applicable for tests, laboratory assignments, field study work, projects, papers, homework, class attendance and participation and other graded activities. No such rule should be in contradiction of other provisions of University Student Rules. Additional rules on grades are listed in Part l, Academic Rules.
48.1 The instructor of the class is the primary authority with respect to a student's proficiency and final grade in that course. A student who believes that his or her final grade reflects a capricious, arbitrary or prejudiced academic evaluation should first discuss the matter with the instructor of the class.
48.2 If no satisfactory resolution is reached with the instructor, or if the instructor is unavailable, and the student wishes to appeal, the student shall appeal to the department head. A grade appeal must be initiated in writing with the course instructor or, if the instructor is unavailable, with the department head within 180 days (six months) of the last day of the semester or summer session in which the disputed grade was earned. The department head will examine the student's appeal in order to determine if the student has established a prima facie case of capricious, arbitrary or prejudiced academic evaluation. If not, the department head will so inform the student and the instructor without delay.
48.3 If a prima facie case exists, the department head will then secure from all parties statements and such other information as he or she deems helpful and will issue his or her findings and remedies, if any. In doing so, the department head will be guided by the principle that it is up to the student to show that a capricious, arbitrary or prejudiced academic evaluation has occurred.
48.4 The student or the instructor may appeal the department head's decision (with respect to findings and/or remedies) to the Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs and Chief Academic Officer. The Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs and Chief Academic Officer will attempt to resolve the matter by informal means within a reasonable period of time.
48.5 If no resolution can be reached, the Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs and Chief Academic Officer will notify the student, the instructor and the department head. Upon receipt of such notification, the student and/or the instructor may file a formal appeal with the appropriate appeals panel. Undergraduate grade appeals are made to the Academic Appeals Panel. If the student is a graduate student, the appropriate panel for all appeals is the Texas A&M University, College Station Graduate Appeals Panel.
48.6 This process does not apply to scholastic dishonesty cases. Scholastic dishonesty cases are appealed through the Galveston Aggie Honor System.